Category: Blog

Capitalizing Versus Expensing Research and Development

Capitalizing Versus Expensing Research and DevelopmentBased on statistics from the World Bank, the United States government spent 3.59 percent of its 2022 gross domestic product on research and development. While private businesses spend on their own research and development costs, it’s important for businesses to treat these expenditures appropriately.

When it comes to research and development outlays, U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) dictate that businesses must expense them during the identical fiscal year as they’re consumed. Accordingly, this creates difficulties for investors and business owners alike in two ways. The first is more uncertain profitability and loss projections. The second is a murkier ability to quantify their rates of return on assets and investments.  

If R&D capitalization is minimal or non-existent by a company, it can imply the business’ total assets (or its total invested capital) doesn’t accurately represent how much has been put into such assets. This will affect the business’ Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Invested Capital (ROIC). This illustrates the importance in differences of how businesses treat their R&D expenses – using the balance sheet to capitalize and the income statement to expense.

Accounting Standards

Per International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), research outlays are classified as expenses annually, like GAAP. However, development costs may be capitalized for businesses with assets under incubation for saleable purposes (in other words, the tech/IP is expected to be approved and produce revenue in the future).

One consideration with IFRS is that a portion of research and development costs may be capitalized or recorded as an asset on the business’ balance sheet, instead of classified as an expense on the Profit and Loss Statement. It’s important, though, to understand that judgment is in the eye of the classification as to how commercially viable a product or service will be in the future, potentially causing issues on the company’s financial statements. Since research and development is sporadic, it impacts a business’ profitability. It’s seen in certain sectors, such as consumer discretionary, healthcare, and technology, to highlight a few.

With revenue, cash flow, and profit expected from the long-term investment of research and development, for products or services with a realistic chance, it should be capitalized and not expensed. Investors need to be aware of the differences in how businesses capitalize or expense their research and development spending, since, without additional financial analysis, it’s important to factor in research and development equally. This is because companies that don’t capitalize experience more unstable earnings.

Exploring Capitalization Versus Expensing

To determine the value and to capitalize such assets, analysts must project the asset’s lifespan to produce benefits (over its economic life) and go with that projection for the amortization period.

Amortization life varies between assets and is based on the economic life of the particular asset. Ways to determine the economic life depend on both the asset’s patentability and/or salability. If there’s a pharmaceutical drug with a 20-year patent, it’ll likely have a much longer life than the next mobile device or graphic processing unit (GPU).

Assuming an asset has a life of six years, the business would amortize equally over the six-year time frame. There can be a multitude of amortization approaches, but the straight-line method is used for the capitalized research and development expenses. It assumes the following figures:

$200,000 spent on R&D

$40,000 residual value

Based on the difference of $160,000 and the six-year economic life, each year would result in approximately $26,666 in amortization expense. After six years, the resulting value would be $40,000 in residual value.

Conclusion

Understanding the importance of accounting for R&D outlays is helpful for businesses to maximize investments for competitiveness and financial compliance.

How to Reduce the Burden of IRA Required Minimum Distributions

IRA Required Minimum DistributionsRequired minimum distributions (RMDs) from traditional IRAs and 401(k)s often become a significant tax burden during retirement. As the percentage of your IRA that must be distributed increases each year, many retirees face higher adjusted gross income and increased exposure to stealth taxes. However, with strategic planning, you can transform RMDs from burdens into opportunities.

Timing Your First RMD

The RMD starting age has changed recently: age 72 for those born before 1951, age 73 for those born 1951-1959, and age 75 for those born in 1960 or later. Your first RMD must be taken by April 1 of the year following when you reach the required age.

While you can delay your first RMD until early the following year, most taxpayers should take it in the year they reach the required age. Delaying means you’ll take two RMDs in one calendar year – your delayed first RMD plus that year’s current RMD – potentially pushing you into higher tax brackets and increasing stealth taxes.

Managing Multiple IRAs

If you own several traditional IRAs, you have valuable flexibility under the aggregation rules. First, calculate the RMD for each IRA separately. Then, you can either take distributions from each IRA individually or combine all RMDs and withdraw the total amount from your IRAs in any ratio you choose, even taking the entire amount from just one account.

This flexibility allows you to rebalance your portfolio, draw down smaller accounts, or meet other financial goals. Just ensure that by December 31, your total distributions equal or exceed the aggregate RMD. Note that inherited IRAs and employer plans like 401(k)s cannot be aggregated and must have their RMDs calculated and taken separately.

Charitable Giving Strategy

One of the most tax-efficient strategies is using qualified charitable distributions (QCDs). If you’re over 70½ and make charitable gifts, taking your RMD as a QCD can reduce your taxable income while satisfying the distribution requirement. This strategy often provides better tax benefits than taking a distribution and then making a separate charitable deduction.

Account Structure Optimization

The tax law allows you to consolidate or split IRAs without tax consequences using direct trustee-to-trustee transfers. Some people prefer multiple IRAs for beneficiary planning, different investment strategies or to keep 401(k) rollover money separate. Others find multiple accounts harder to manage and worry about unequal performance affecting beneficiaries differently.

Consider your specific situation: if you have a qualified longevity annuity contract (QLAC) that delays RMDs until age 85, managing it in a separate IRA might be easier.

In-Kind Distributions

You don’t need to sell assets to generate cash for RMDs. Instead, you can make in-kind distributions by transferring securities directly from your IRA to a taxable account. This preserves your asset allocation and can be particularly advantageous when assets have temporarily declined in value.

With in-kind distributions, the asset’s value on the distribution date becomes your new tax basis. If you believe a depressed asset will recover, distributing it allows the ordinary income tax on the current low value while future appreciation becomes tax-advantaged long-term capital gains. This strategy is also helpful for unconventional assets like real estate or small business interests that are difficult to sell in portions.

Distribution Timing and Amount

You can take RMDs anytime during the year. Some prefer monthly distributions for regular cash flow, others take distributions early to ensure compliance, and some wait until year-end to maximize tax deferral and delay estimated tax payments.

Remember that RMDs are minimums – you can always take more. Consider larger distributions in years when your tax rate is unusually low due to higher deductions or lower income. This reduces future RMDs when your tax rate might be higher.

Conclusion

Strategic RMD planning can significantly reduce their tax impact. By understanding timing options, leveraging aggregation rules, using charitable strategies, optimizing account structures, considering in-kind distributions and timing distributions strategically, you can turn required distributions into opportunities for smart tax and retirement planning.

How to Evaluate Accounts Receivables

Reconcile Accounts Receivable, Evaluate Accounts ReceivableAccording to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, collection agencies saw $16.28 billion in revenue in 2019. While revenues have declined somewhat in recent years, unpaid invoices are still big business. Accounts receivable aging reports can help companies identify and mitigate unpaid invoices and potentially lower a business’ need to send unpaid invoices to collection agencies.

An accounts receivable aging report analyzes how well a company manages its accounts receivables (AR) and identifies the level of any abnormalities. It looks at receivables based on their age; specifically, the time the invoice has been unpaid and outstanding. Then, once receivables have been analyzed for non-payment based on different time frames, the business can determine whether to follow up with the customer, send it to collections, or write the invoice off.

Whether it’s created manually through a spreadsheet or done in conjunction with accounting or billing software, either way the AR aging report takes data from the company’s accounts receivable ledger. The following is a general overview of how to create this report:

Step 1: Aggregate invoices and determine if any credit memos or outstanding adjustments on outstanding invoices need to be addressed first.

Step 2: Create time frames for the invoices, be it buckets such as: 1. 0-30 days. 2. 31-60 days. 3. 60+ days. These can be referred to as “aging buckets” to categorize the invoices.

Step 3: Ensure fields for customer information, invoice details, invoice amounts, notes, etc., are ready for the information to flow into.

Step 4: Calculate unpaid invoice balances and group them by customer and time frame.

While this is only an example and can be modified based upon the company’s needs, it’s a starting point for further analysis. From there, along with updating the report on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis, the company can identify how to improve its cash position by determining its weak points.

One important consideration, especially for businesses with high levels of old, uncollected receivables, is that the company’s collection practices can be re-evaluated more effectively. The analysis can show that some customers take too long, and the company needs to be more proactive in following up with them sooner. It can also convey the need to incentivize their collections with early payment discounts.

This data also enables a company to identify customers who have outstanding payments and assess the associated risk to the company’s credit rating. Especially for publicly traded companies, and even for private equity investment evaluations, investors can see how competitive or not their credit rating is compared to similar companies in the same industry. When analyzing customers, it may be necessary to tighten terms or simply stop doing business with the customer.

Companies can offer pre- or early payment terms, with discounts available to customers who pay their invoices upon receipt or within a certain time frame. During challenging conditions for a particular sector or for the economy overall, businesses can set up payment plans to maintain positive relations with certain customers.

While there’s no perfect accounts receivable aging report, an effective one will organize, identify, and reduce the likelihood of increasing numbers of unpaid invoices.

Sources

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/REVEF56144ALLEST

5 Myths About Life Insurance

Myths About Life InsuranceLife insurance is something most of us don’t want to talk about. But the truth is, no one gets out of life alive. So, it might make sense to face it now so that when you really need it, it’s there. Before you start looking for a life insurance policy, let’s dispel some of the untruths you might have heard.

Myth #1: It’s too expensive. According to a recent survey by Life Insurance Marketing and Research Association (LIMRA), 52 percent of people thought it was too expensive to have or get more of. And how did they come to this conclusion? They based this on their “gut instinct,” or a “wild guess.” Truth is, it’s more affordable than you think and varies from person to person. In fact, the estimated yearly cost of a $500,000, 30-year term insurance policy for a healthy 30-year-old, non-smoking female is $316.

Myth #2: It’s a pain to apply. Not true. Thanks to the pandemic, which caused us to eliminate or reduce human interactions (like getting a doctor’s exam for term policies), you can apply online. These days, all you have to do is answer a few questions on your phone. Easy peasy.

Myth #3: My company’s policy is enough. Maybe. The coverage you have might not be enough for your family. Here are some facts. The median workplace life insurance coverage is either just a flat sum of $20,000 or one year’s salary.Of U.S. households that rely on workplace life insurance coverage, 44 percent say their families would struggle financially in less than six months should a wage earner die unexpectedly. So, what to do? A simple guideline is this: Aim for 10 to 12 times your annual salary and bonus, but people who are younger (farther away from retirement) might need more. Folks closer to retirement might need less.

Myth #4: I only need coverage if I’m working. If you’re not employed outside the home – like if you’re a stay-at-home mom – it’s still important to consider life insurance. Typically, life insurance is considered a replacement for lost income. If something happens to the non-breadwinner, it could also be necessary to pay for childcare and household work in your absence. The most important thing is to plan your coverage together with your family in mind so that you’re both in the best position possible should one of you pass away.

Myth #5: I don’t need life insurance until I’m older or become a parent. Nope. In fact, not only do you not have to be a parent, but your beneficiary could also be your partner or anyone else who relies on you. And you can change your beneficiaries (you can have more than one), should things change. Plus, if you apply for life insurance earlier in life, you’ll save money on premiums. Why? Because one thing that factors into how much you pay – or qualify for coverage at all – is your health. As you get older, your risk for developing health issues increases. According to LIMRA, 40 percent of those who have policies wish they’d bought them when they were younger.

In the end, you’ll want to take care of those who depend on you – and those you love. That’s why knowing the truth about life insurance matters.

Sources

Myths about life insurance | Fidelity

Beyond the Hype: A Strategic Blueprint for AI Investment in 2025 and Beyond

AI Investment in 2025Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the most talked-about technologies today. It has taken a shift from the broad general-purpose tools to specialized innovations that promise real impact. AI is dominating headlines with investor pitches. There has also been a surge in startups promising AI-powered solutions. However, some businesses have already adopted and invested millions into AI projects with little return. As AI advances, business owners and investors need to stop chasing the latest headlines and consider how to best integrate AI to create lasting value.

Understanding the AI Investment Landscape in 2025

Since the AI breakout, it has advanced dramatically. There are three forces that are reshaping the investment and adoption of AI.

  1. Maturation of Foundation Models
    The large language models (LLMs) are now cheaper and faster. They are also customizable. This means that businesses no longer need to build from scratch and can just adapt existing models in their industry.
  2. Regulations and Accountability
    Governments are tightening frameworks around data privacy, transparency, and responsible AI. Compliance has become a key competitive differentiator.
  3. Sector-Specific Applications
    Advancements in AI have given way to specialized use cases. For example, fintech AI can track fraud, while manufacturing AI optimizes the supply chain.

The AI Hype Cycle

According to Gartner’s 2025 “Hype Cycle for Artificial Intelligence.” AI technologies move through predictable stages. These include the innovation trigger, peak of inflated expectations, trough of disillusionment, slope of enlightenment, and plateau of productivity. Between 2023 and 2024, generative AI dominated the headlines. It has now entered the trough of disillusionment as organizations confront their limitations, governance risks, and the difficulty of proving ROI. However, this is not to be seen as a setback, but rather a turning point as businesses shift focus from experimentation to scaling reasonably. Investment is now focused on foundational enablers such as ready data, ModelOps for lifecycle management, and AI agents. By 2025, businesses will be realizing that quick wins are harder than expected. On the bright side, businesses have an opportunity to build sustainable systems that offer measurable business value.

Lessons Learned from the First Wave of AI Adoption

The promises that came with AI led some businesses to invest heavily. This resulted in several mistakes:

  • Chasing innovation over value
    Many businesses rushed to invest in AI-powered projects like chatbots without linking them to actual business goals. For instance, customers have raised concerns about frustration with bank AI bots that confuse rather than help customers, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
  • Falling for AI hype
    Some businesses invested in companies branding themselves as AI-driven, even when the solutions offered relied on basic automation.
  • Ignoring integration
    Failing to consider that AI is not a plug-and-play solution. This saw some early adopters underestimating the cultural, technical, and operational changes required to integrate AI into workflows.

A Strategic Blueprint for AI Investment

For businesses to invest wisely:

  1. Start with the problem, not the tool
    Instead of shopping for tools to adopt, a business should first ponder what problem it wants to solve. This means clearly defining the problem to solve, such as personalizing marketing campaigns or predicting supply shortages. Clarifying a problem ensures the AI investment is focused and not an experiment.
  2. Build a portfolio approach
    Borrowing from how investors diversify portfolios, a business should also diversify its AI initiatives. They can do this by balancing short-term projects, such as automating repetitive tasks, with long-term projects like predictive analytics. This is to ensure there is a steady return on investment.
  3. Prioritize responsible and compliant AI
    Reputation is crucial, and businesses should avoid mishandling customer data. To do this, companies must invest in compliance, transparency, and explainability as part of their AI strategy.
  4. Invest in people, not just technology
    AI does not replace talent. Companies should invest in training and upskilling their workforce. This prepares employees to work well with the new technology to ensure adoption is smooth and effective.
  5. Build scalable infrastructure
    Even with the most advanced AI model, failing to have the right foundation will result in unsuccessful implementation. The lesson? Companies must invest in flexible systems that can grow with them.

Conclusion

AI is no longer a futuristic concept. It is a business reality. Adopting AI alone is not enough, and businesses need to do it wisely. Businesses should refrain from jumping on the latest trends. Instead, make strategic choices that align with long-term goals. The focus should be on the problems to be solved and not the tools. 

Restricted Stock Units: 5 Essential Tax and Financial Planning Strategies

Restricted Stock Units, RSUsReceiving restricted stock units (RSUs) may seem straightforward, but the tax and financial planning complexities can catch many employees off guard. Understanding these key strategies might help you avoid costly mistakes and optimize your financial outcomes.

1. Manage Tax Withholding at Vesting

The most common pitfall with RSUs is inadequate tax withholding when shares vest. Companies typically withhold taxes at a flat 22 percent rate for federal taxes (37 percent for amounts over $1 million annually), but this often falls short of your actual tax obligation. Financial planners identify this as the biggest issue they see with RSU clients. Many are surprised by large tax bills because the withholding didn’t cover their full liability.

Managing proper tax withholding is often the primary focus of RSU planning. The challenge becomes even more complex when stock prices are volatile, making it difficult to predict exact tax obligations.

Higher RSU income increases the likelihood of under-withholding. When shares can’t be sold to cover additional taxes, alternative payment methods must be planned. Quarterly estimated taxes are one option, though this becomes complicated when the current year income differs significantly from the prior year.

The most effective approach is to conduct quarterly tax projections or work with a CPA to maintain compliance with safe harbor requirements for federal taxes throughout the year.

2. Comprehensive RSU Planning Questions

While RSUs appear simpler than stock options due to their fixed vesting schedules, this perception can be misleading. Financial advisors warn that numerous organizational details can create problems without proper planning.

Key planning considerations include potential state moves during vesting periods, which trigger mobility tax issues, and coordination with ESPP purchases and stock option exercises to avoid wash sale complications. Essential questions for RSU planning include understanding personal goals, assessing wealth concentration levels, determining how much needs to be diversified, ensuring spouse awareness of concentration risks, analyzing the ratio of vested to unvested shares, tracking upcoming vests and trading windows, and evaluating prior year income impacts.

A critical concern is spousal awareness of company stock concentration. Financial planners frequently encounter situations where busy tech employees accumulate significant wealth while their spouses remain unaware that their entire financial security depends on one company’s stock performance.

3. Reduce Taxable Income During Vesting Years

Beyond harvesting capital losses, several strategies can reduce your overall tax burden in years when RSUs vest. These include maximizing 401(k) deferrals, funding Health Savings Accounts, participating in nonqualified deferred compensation plans if available, and donating appreciated company stock to donor-advised funds to exceed standard deduction thresholds.

4. The Hold Versus Sell Decision

Once RSUs vest and you own the shares, deciding whether to hold or sell becomes crucial. Financial advisors routinely recommend selling RSU shares immediately upon vesting, before significant price fluctuations occur. This recommendation is particularly strong for clients already holding substantial company stock positions, as additional concentration increases unnecessary risk.

Many clients choose to sell immediately and deploy proceeds toward other financial goals. This approach helps diversify their overall portfolio and reduces company-specific risk.

5. Navigate Trading Windows

RSU selling plans must account for company trading windows, which dictate when employees can sell shares. Understanding these restrictions is essential for effective RSU management.

When advisors recommend selling RSUs at vesting, they don’t mean selling on the exact vesting date. Instead, they mean selling when trading windows permit, typically after earnings calls. These windows usually last four to six weeks, and while exact dates can’t be predicted far in advance, historical patterns provide reasonable estimates.

Financial planners coordinate clients’ RSU vesting schedules with anticipated trading windows to develop realistic selling strategies. This coordination ensures clients can execute their plans within company restrictions while maintaining compliance with insider trading rules and any existing 10b5-1 trading plans.

Conclusion

Proper RSU planning requires understanding these interconnected elements and developing strategies that align with your broader financial goals while managing tax implications effectively.

Understanding Depreciation Recapture

Understanding Depreciation RecaptureWhen it comes to businesses and asset depreciation, there are many types available, such as straight-line, units of production, double declining balance, and sum of years digits. While these aren’t the only ones, they are available via the IRS code and help businesses reduce their taxable income. However, under certain circumstances, businesses have to be mindful when selling assets for a gain that could cause a tax liability through depreciation recapture.

Understanding Depreciation

Depreciation is defined as the reduction in the value of an asset through wear and tear. It can be a rental property or production equipment. Investors can use depreciation to lower their taxable income. While some companies can depreciate an asset’s value to $0, other companies may determine if an asset has salvage or scrap value when they sell it off to replace it with a more productive asset.

When an asset is sold off and it’s sold for a gain, the Internal Revenue Service considers this depreciation recapture. The IRS makes this determination because it missed the business’ taxable income that was otherwise reduced through depreciation at an earlier point in time.

When a business or investor has had possession of such assets for more than 12 months and it was depreciated to reduce taxable income, taxes may be collected if the asset is sold for a gain. It’s important to note that for assets sold at a loss, depreciation recapture doesn’t apply.

Assets that fall under Section 1250 and Section 1245 of the IRS Code, and what rate the asset is taxed at, depend on how the IRS classifies the asset. Section 1245 taxes filers at ordinary tax rates and applies to personal property such as manufacturing equipment and transportation vehicles. Section 1250 applies to real property such as warehouses, commercial buildings, and rental properties. Taxed at no more than 25 percent, Section 1250 depreciation recapture is indexed according to the filer’s ordinary tax rate.

Calculating Depreciation Recapture

This process looks at the discrepancy between the adjusted cost basis and what the asset sells for. It’s calculated as follows:

  1. Determine the cost paid for the asset, plus additional costs for the asset’s fees
  2. Calculate the asset’s adjusted cost basis. The section looks at both the impact of adding capital improvements to the asset, along with any potential loss accounts.
  3. Is there any loss or gain? Assets sold by a business for a loss, or lower than the adjusted basis, don’t trigger the depreciation recapture. However, if an asset’s sale results in a gain that’s higher than the asset’s adjusted basis, the business incurs a depreciation recapture tax obligation. It’s important to distinguish timelines. For example, if it’s one year or less, it’s short-term. If it’s for more than one year, it’s long-term. 

Illustrating Section 1245 Depreciation Recapture Calculation

As an example, let’s say a company bought a truck for its business needs for $50,000 and owned it for five years. After five years, the company sold it for $30,000.

Accumulated depreciation over the life of the item is $25,000. The adjusted basis is $25,000. The $30,000 sales price, minus the $25,000 adjusted basis, results in a $5,000 gain. With the accumulated depreciation of $25,000 compared to the $5,000 gain, the depreciation recapture is $5,000, which is taxed at ordinary rates.

When it comes to ensuring a business’ tax compliance is adhered to, understanding how depreciation recapture works is one part of the tax code that companies need to understand fully to ensure taxes are filed accurately.

 

7 Remote Jobs That Provide Training

7 Remote Jobs That Provide TrainingIf you’ve ever longed for a remote job but weren’t sure how to make it happen, then take note. Not only are all these jobs work from home (WFH), but they also provide training. Some even provide the equipment and steady hours right from the start. Whether you’re between jobs or want to switch careers, check out these positions. One of them could be a perfect fit.

Amazon Virtual Customer Service Associate

With this job, you’ll get three to four weeks of paid training before you even start working with customers. Pretty great, right? They also teach you how to manage orders and solve issues using internal tools. In fact, you’ll be provided with a desktop computer, a microphone, and a headset. All you’ll need is reliable internet. You’ll interact with everyone from customers and drivers to shippers and Delivery Service Partners. Best of all, there’s no script to learn; they encourage you to be your authentic self. The job offers part-time and full-time options, and roles are open year-round across many parts of the United States.

Apple At-Home Advisor

For Mac lovers, this is your dream job because guess what you’ll get with this job? That’s right: a Mac – plus other tools to get started. Your training will be remote and paid. During this time, you’ll be introduced to product support, the accompanying issues customers fac,e and problems related to their orders. If you’re up for dealing with people, then this job is for you. Many advisors stay long-term, thanks to strong internal mobility and a supportive team culture.

Dell Remote Tech Support Specialist

If you’re a PC kind of person and comfortable with tech, Dell’s paid training will help you troubleshoot issues for customers right from home sweet home. You’ll also enjoy solid benefits and receive discounts on devices and tools. Lots of people climb the ladder, moving up into engineering or systems roles after gaining on-the-job experience.

Hyatt Remote Guest Services Associate

Ever called guest services when you’re at a hotel? If so, then these folks are likely who you talked to. During your paid training, you’ll receive all the equipment you need and learn how to not only assist customers, but also uphold brand standards, which translates to just being a decent, empathetic human. Many people find long-term stability here and, after some experience, move up into leadership roles.

Hilton Remote Reservations Sales Specialist

Four to seven weeks is all it takes to be trained for this job. It’s fully online and focused on helping you master their booking and support systems. After training, you’ll earn incentives and gain access to generous hotel discounts as a full employee. If you’ve got a travel bug, this is for you.

Prudential Financial Remote Customer Service Representative

This paid training can last up to 10 weeks, but afterward, you’ll be fully set up to understand their systems, policies, and customer needs. Should you become full-time, you’ll get 401(k) matching and tuition support. If you want to get your foot in the door with finances, this is a smart path, especially if you’re switching careers later in life.

Progressive Insurance Work-From-Home Claims Representative

In this position, you’ll be trained (and paid) to learn how to handle real-world claims. You’ll help customers recover after accidents while also gaining valuable experience in one of the country’s leading insurance firms. Better still, you’ll also have access to stock options and opportunities for advancement.

No matter where you are in your professional life, paid training is the way to go; it makes remote jobs so much easier to attain – and succeed in. So, if you’re ready to learn a new skill in the comforts of home, this kind of work might well be in your future.

Sources

15 Work-From-Home Jobs That Provide Paid Training – The Penny Hoarder

How Businesses Can Build Disinformation Resilience

What is Disinformation ResilienceThe digital landscape has rapidly advanced, fueled by generative AI and other transformative technologies. Although this has come with great opportunities, it has also introduced new strategic threats. Among these is disinformation. The World Economic Forum classifies misinformation and disinformation as a top global threat alongside conflict and environment in its 2025 global risks report. With generative AI becoming more sophisticated, threat actors (like deepfakes, voice cloning, viral hoaxes and AI-driven scams) are increasing in frequency and precision. Therefore, business leaders need to act fast to build disinformation resilience.

Why Disinformation Matters for Business

Disinformation is the intentional spread of false or misleading information with malicious intent. This is unlike misinformation, which is unintentional and often shared by individuals who believe it’s true. However, both can have serious consequences for a business.

Historically, disinformation mainly targeted political processes or public institutions. Today, this threat has expanded to the corporate world to become a strategic business risk.

For example, a deepfake video of a CEO announcing mass layoffs will likely affect a company’s stock price. While fake reviews – positive or negative – can also sway consumer decisions. A viral tweet might spark public backlash and disrupt operations. In the United States, billions of dollars have already been lost from disinformation created by deepfakes, with the figures expected to rise in the coming years.

Impact of Disinformation on Business Operations

Disinformation impacts a business in various ways, such as:

  • Financial risk – false narratives can manipulate market behavior or stock prices.
  • Reputation and trust – fabricated information can erode customer trust and brand credibility.
  • Internal noise – false information can lead to confusion or the unintentional spread of incorrect content.
  • Operational disruption – false reports may trigger emergency protocols, overreactions or divert resources from core objectives.
  • Regulatory and legal exposure – new laws hold platforms and even companies accountable for hosting or spreading harmful fake content.

Building a Proactive Disinformation Resilience Strategy

To effectively counter disinformation, businesses need a comprehensive strategy that integrates technological solutions, human intelligence, and proactive communication.

  1. Awareness and Training
    Employees are a great asset and at the same time can be a potential vulnerability. Therefore, all employees from frontline staff to C-suite should be aware of how disinformation works, know red flags, and be empowered to verify suspicious content. They should frequently undergo comprehensive training programs that focus on digital literacy, critical thinking, and fact-checking techniques.
  2. Monitoring and Detection Tools
    Early detection is crucial. It requires advanced monitoring tools that deploy AI-powered social listening, threat intelligence platforms, and real-time deepfake detection systems that analyze image, video, and audio content. Combining these tools with automated alerts enables a swift response before a false narrative spreads.
  3. Robust Internal Protocols
    Develop and enforce clear escalation protocols for suspected disinformation. These should detail a chain of command, verification steps, and PR responses. Employees must know whom to alert and how to safeguard systems quickly.
  4. Platform and Partnership Engagement
    Collaborate with social platforms, fact checkers, and cybersecurity firms to detect and report false content. This will also help build relationships with journalists and analysis firms to enable faster content removal and more credible public debunking.
  5. Trust-First Content Strategies
    Deploy blue-check verified accounts, metadata authentication, digital signature,s and watermarking. A business also may consistently share authentic updates, reinforce company values, and build a track record of transparency to strengthen stakeholder trust.

Policy and Regulatory Landscape

Governments worldwide are recognizing the gravity of this threat. New laws are emerging globally to hold platforms accountable and to protect individuals and businesses.

One example is the Take It Down Act, signed into law on May 19, 2025, which mandates the removal of non-consensual deepfakes. This sets a legal precedent for holding platforms responsible for hosting synthetic media that harms individuals or businesses.

Other legal frameworks are evolving globally with a focus on developing fact-checking and AI-usage policies. Businesses must stay informed of the latest regulations and ensure their internal policies are compliant.

Future Proofing with AI and Collaboration

While generative AI can be used wrongly, it is also a powerful tool in real-time detection and content verification. Since the fight against disinformation is a continuous journey of adaptation and vigilance, businesses must:

  • Integrate advanced detection systems into their security stack
  • Standardize watermarking across distributed content
  • Engage in multi-stakeholder alliances across industries and governments to share insights and define best practices

Conclusion

In an era where false information spreads faster than the truth, disinformation is no longer just a public concern but also a serious business risk. The threat landscape is evolving fast with deepfake scams and coordinated smear campaigns; hence, corporate strategy must evolve, too. Businesses have to build disinformation resilience through proactive systems, employee awareness, trusted communication channels, and ongoing vigilance.

The Big Beautiful Bill, Rolling Back Public Television and Radio, and Regulating the Cryptocurrency Industry

The Big Beautiful BillOne Big Beautiful Bill Act (HR 1) – Introduced by Rep. Jody Arrington (R-TX) on May 20, this bill passed in the House on May 22, the Senate with changes on July 1, and once again in the House on July 3. Signed into law on July 4, this bill includes the following provisions:

  • Makes permanent the income and estate tax provisions passed in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
  • Increases the annual limit to $7,500 for Dependent Care Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs), starting in 2026.
  • Makes permanent the ability for employers to offer tax-free student loan repayment assistance up to $5,250 a year, with the cap indexed for inflation.
  • Starting in 2026, new tax-advantaged “Trump Account” savings plans may be opened for eligible children under age 18. The account will receive a one-time $1,000 deposit by the government (for children born in 2025 through 2028) and allow for non-deductible/after-tax contributions of up to $5,000 a year (indexed for inflation). However, note that funds cannot be withdrawn before the beneficiary turns 18, and money withdrawn before age 59½ is subject to both income taxes and a 10 percent penalty (with exceptions for college tuition and a first-time home purchase).
  • While the bill calls for untaxed tips and overtime pay, this tax break will be delivered in the form of a deduction claimed on individual tax returns. For cash or charged tips, up to $25,000; for overtime pay, the deduction is up to $12,500/$25,000 for joint filers. Phase-out deductions will apply to both based on income.
  • Allows up to a $10,000 tax deduction for interest paid on an auto loan used to purchase a qualified vehicle.
  • New tax deduction for seniors age 65+: $6,000 for single filers; $12,000 for joint filers.
  • The bill does not include an extension of the enhanced credits for the Affordable Care Act, scheduled to expire at the end of the year. This is expected to increase average exchange health insurance premiums by 75 percent starting next year.

Relating to consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 4) to rescind certain budget authority proposed to be rescinded in special messages transmitted to the Congress by the president on June 3, in accordance with section 1012(a) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (HRes 590) – On July 17, Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) introduced this rescissions bill, which essentially cuts $1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CBP). The CBP is a private, nonprofit corporation that was authorized by Congress in 1967 to be the steward of the federal government’s investment in public broadcasting. The elimination of this federal funding will force many local public radio and television stations to shut down. The legislation, which also rescinds $8 billion from a variety of foreign aid programs, was passed as a House rule that enabled full passage of the rescissions bill due to a provision that avoids a direct vote on the bill. The bill passed in the House on July 18 and does not require approval by the Senate or to be signed into law by the president.

GENIUS Act (S 1582) – Introduced by Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-TN) on May 1, this legislation is designed to regulate the currently unregulated cryptocurrency industry. The Act requires issuers to back stablecoins on at least a $1-to-$1 basis. The bill is intended to set guardrails for the industry via full reserve backing, monthly audits, and anti-money laundering compliance regulations. This bill also enables a wider range of issuers to enter the market, including banks, fintechs, and major retailers. The legislation was passed in the Senate on June 17, the House on July 1,7, and was signed into law on July 18.

Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act (HR 1919) – Introduced by Rep. Tom Emmer (R-MN) on March 6, this is a companion bill to the Genius Act. It would prohibit Federal Reserve Banks from offering certain products or services directly to individuals and disallow the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy, among other provisions (CBDC stands for Central Bank Digital Currency). The bill passed in the House on July 17 and currently awaits its fate in the Senate.

Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (HR 3633) – Another Genius Act companion bill, the goal of this legislation is to provide a regulatory system by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission for the sale of digital commodities. The bill was introduced on May 29 by Rep. French Hill (R-AR), passed in the House on July 17, and currently lies with the Senate.